An enterprise is designing a privileged access management and lifecycle workflow for emergency Cloud Identity super administrator access to remediate critical identity federation and authentication outages. The security architecture must satisfy the following governance and operational requirements: Prevent unilateral activation of emergency privileges by enforcing dual authorization or multi-party controls. Require pre-configured, audited justifications tied directly to incident management tickets. Enforce time-bound privilege elevation that automatically revokes access after task completion. Generate real-time security alerts and audit logging across all elevation events. Which strategy should the organization implement to manage this privileged access lifecycle?

Implement Privileged Access Manager (PAM) entitlements with required multi-party approvals and maximum grant durations, complemented by pre-provisioned dedicated breakglass accounts using split-knowledge credentials and real-time audit alerts.: ### What Privileged Access Manager and Breakglass Architecture Is **Privileged Access Manager (PAM)** is a Google Cloud security service designed to manage, approve, and audit **just-in-time (JIT)** temporary privilege elevations for sensitive cloud resources. For root-level identity management where Cloud Identity super administrator credentials must be accessed in emergency disaster recovery scenarios, this architecture pairs PAM with **pre-provisioned breakglass accounts** governed by strict administrative controls. ### How It Meets the Requirements - **Dual authorization and abuse prevention**: PAM allows organizations to enforce multi-party or service account-mediated approval workflows. For direct Cloud Identity breakglass credentials, organizations can implement **split operations** (such as one administrator holding the password vault access while a second administrator holds the physical hardware security token). - **Audited justifications tied to change management**: PAM requires requesters to submit formal business justifications and ITSM ticket IDs upon requesting a grant, and approvers must explicitly justify elevation approvals. - **Time-bound automatic revocation**: PAM entitlements define a **maximum duration** for each grant. When the duration expires or when the requester manually completes the task, PAM automatically revokes the IAM bindings, eliminating standing privileges. - **Real-time auditing and alerting**: Elevation events and PAM activities are logged to Cloud Audit Logs and can trigger real-time alerts through custom Event Threat Detection (ETD) modules in Security Command Center. ### Key Advantages - **Minimizes standing privileges**: Prevents persistent administrative assignments across daily human identities. - **Comprehensive audit trail**: Retains detailed records of who requested access, the justification provided, who authorized the grant, and what operations were performed. - **Automated offboarding and lifecycle enforcement**: Time-bound grants eliminate manual cleanup overhead after emergency incident resolution. - **Granular scope control**: PAM supports tag-based conditions and custom resource scoping to restrict temporary elevation strictly to designated folders or projects. ### Why This Is Optimal This solution provides defense-in-depth by integrating automated just-in-time privilege elevation for day-to-day operational escalations while maintaining securely segregated, dual-custody breakglass procedures for emergency recovery of primary Cloud Identity infrastructure.

Cloud Identity Super Admin Breakglass Lifecycle | Professional Cloud Security Engineer

Cloud Identity Super Admin Breakglass Lifecycle

Worked example. The correct answer is already marked and every option is explained below, so there is nothing to select here. To answer questions yourself, start the free trial.

An enterprise is designing a privileged access management and lifecycle workflow for emergency Cloud Identity super administrator access to remediate critical identity federation and authentication outages.

The security architecture must satisfy the following governance and operational requirements:

Prevent unilateral activation of emergency privileges by enforcing dual authorization or multi-party controls.
Require pre-configured, audited justifications tied directly to incident management tickets.
Enforce time-bound privilege elevation that automatically revokes access after task completion.
Generate real-time security alerts and audit logging across all elevation events.

Which strategy should the organization implement to manage this privileged access lifecycle?

Create a shared Google Group containing all security operators, assign the Organization Administrator role to the group, and rely on standard Cloud Audit Logs for post-event reviews.

Store shared Super Admin credentials in Secret Manager, granting Cloud IAM Secret Accessor permissions to the Operations team with automatic secret rotation enabled.

Assign permanent Cloud Identity Super Admin roles to lead security engineers, but restrict daily logins using context-aware IP whitelisting in the Google Admin Console.

Implement Privileged Access Manager (PAM) entitlements with required multi-party approvals and maximum grant durations, complemented by pre-provisioned dedicated breakglass accounts using split-knowledge credentials and real-time audit alerts.

Professional Cloud Security Engineer

Cloud Identity Super Admin Breakglass Lifecycle

Related questions